News

Backlash After City Government Spends $50,000 on “Ugly” Sign

Update, May 26: The Highland County Press was kind enough to send us photos of the sign, which are now posted here by reader request.


A newly installed sign in Hillsboro, OH that was paid for with money from a coronavirus relief fund has come under fire, the Highland County Press reports.

At a recent city council meeting, one council member and two citizens voiced their opposition to the sign, citing both its cost and safety concerns. Additionally, the council member argued the sign wasn’t properly approved.

The digital sign set the city back $48,340, with $30,000 going to the local shop that landed the contract, according to the report.

There are also folks who aren’t thrilled with the sign’s appearance.

As one article commenter opines, “The sign is a distraction in one of the busiest intersection areas of the city. … Plus, who approved the design? It’s ugly and looks far out of place in the downtown district, historical or not.”

Read more at the Highland County Press.

Signs of the Times Staff

Signs of the Times has been the world leader in sign information since 1906. Contact Signs of the Times' editors at editor@signsofthetimes.com.

Recent Posts

Michigan Residents Make Parodies of Viral Detroit City Sign

The sign has inspired two rap songs and a wave of backyard installations.

18 hours ago

What Makes the Perfect Sign Business Partnership

Complementary skills and talents but a singular mindset.

1 day ago

Marketing Signs to Schools, Tradeshow and Quote Follow-up Make May’s List

Plus, some health suggestions from a fellow sign pro.

1 day ago

Church Sign Found After Being Stolen From Cemetery

A shuttered Connecticut church sign had been missing, information still sought.

1 day ago

PRINTING United Alliance Forms Strategic Partnership with ASI

The move benefits members of both organizations.

3 days ago

The Joy of Working

Brief reflections on doing what you love.

3 days ago